Ethics code: IR.NASRME.REC.1404.023
1- Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
2- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iranز
3- Social Determinants of Health Research Center. Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
2- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iranز
3- Social Determinants of Health Research Center. Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
Abstract: (20 Views)
Objevtive(s): The family physician, as a cornerstone of primary health care, plays a vital role in improving community health, reducing healthcare costs, and promoting equity in access to services. Considering the diversity of family physician employment models and their impact on the quality and efficiency of healthcare services, this study aimed to review and compare various models of family physician employment across health systems worldwide.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on the six-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley. Relevant Persian and English sources were searched in major databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley, Science Direct, Magiran, and Google Scholar. Eligible articles were selected according to predefined inclusion criteria, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach with MAXQDA software.
Results: Of 5,069 identified articles, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen family physician employment models were identified and categorized into six main groups: clinic-based, team-based, performance contract, community-based, integrated, and government-financed models. The main advantages included improved efficiency, accessibility, quality, and health equity. The main challenges were found in management, human resources, and service delivery. Success factors were categorized as internal (structural) and external (political, economic, social, and technological).
Conclusion: The efficiency of family physician employment models depends on the structural and contextual characteristics of each health system. Selecting an appropriate model requires consideration of available resources, policies, and population needs. The findings can guide policymakers in optimizing family physician programs and strengthening primary health care.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on the six-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley. Relevant Persian and English sources were searched in major databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley, Science Direct, Magiran, and Google Scholar. Eligible articles were selected according to predefined inclusion criteria, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach with MAXQDA software.
Results: Of 5,069 identified articles, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen family physician employment models were identified and categorized into six main groups: clinic-based, team-based, performance contract, community-based, integrated, and government-financed models. The main advantages included improved efficiency, accessibility, quality, and health equity. The main challenges were found in management, human resources, and service delivery. Success factors were categorized as internal (structural) and external (political, economic, social, and technological).
Conclusion: The efficiency of family physician employment models depends on the structural and contextual characteristics of each health system. Selecting an appropriate model requires consideration of available resources, policies, and population needs. The findings can guide policymakers in optimizing family physician programs and strengthening primary health care.
type of study: Systematic Reviw |
Subject:
Public Health
Received: 2025/05/27 | Accepted: 2025/11/23 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/09/15
Received: 2025/05/27 | Accepted: 2025/11/23 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/09/15
References
1. Arya N, Gibson C, Ponka D, Haq C, Hansel S, Dahlman B, et al. Family medicine around the world: overview by region: The Besrour Papers: a series on the state of family medicine in the world. Canadian Family Physician 2017;63:436-41
2. Chtioui S. Health sector reform: issues and opportunities. Journal of US-China Public Administration 2022;19:85-94 [DOI:10.17265/1548-6591/2022.03.001]
3. Mohammad A, Mehdi R, Reza C, Eisa N. Family physician: The mutual satisfaction of physicians and health care team members. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences 2012; 18:24-30 [in Persian]
4. Than Sein U, editor. Health sector reform: issues and opportunities. Regional Health Forum. WHO South-East Asia Region: India, 2000
5. Dahrouge S, Hogg WE, Russell G, Tuna M, Geneau R, Muldoon LK, et al. Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices. The Canadian Medical Association Journal 2012;184:E135-E43 [DOI:10.1503/cmaj.110407]
6. Mohammadibakhsh R, Aryankhesal A, Jafari M, Damari B. Family physician model in the health system of selected countries: A comparative study summary. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2020;9:160 [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_709_19]
7. Kringos DS, Boerma WG, Hutchinson A, Van der Zee J, Groenewegen PP. The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions. BMC Health Services Research 2010;10:1-13 [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-65]
8. Committee FoFMPL. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. The Annals of Family Medicine 2004;2:S3-S32 [DOI:10.1370/afm.130]
9. Jackson GL, Powers BJ, Chatterjee R, Prvu Bettger J, Kemper AR, Hasselblad V, et al. The patient-centered medical home: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158: 169-78 [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579]
10. Porter ME. What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363:2477-81 [DOI:10.1056/NEJMp1011024]
11. Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology. 1st Edition, Oxford university press: United States, 1998 [DOI:10.1093/oso/9780195125429.001.0001]
12. Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Dedeu T, Hasvold T, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. British Journal of General Practice 2013;63:e742-e50 [DOI:10.3399/bjgp13X674422]
13. Mitchell, P., M. Wynia, R. Golden, B. McNellis, S. Okun, C.E. Webb V. Rohrbach, Mitchell P, M Wynia R. Golden, B. McNellis, S. OkunC.E. Webb V. Rohrbach, and I. Von Kohorn. Core principles & values of effective team-based health care. 1st Edition, Institute of Medicine: Washington, 2012
14. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, Morrison C. Video consultations for covid-19. British Medical Journal Publishing Group 2020; 12:368 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.m998]
15. Arksey H, O'malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005;8:19-32 [DOI:10.1080/1364557032000119616]
16. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77-101 [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
17. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 2018;169:467-73 [DOI:10.7326/M18-0850]
18. Nie Z, Chen C, Chen G, Wang C, Gan Y, Feng Y, et al. Development and validation of a model to predict the contract Service of Family Doctor: a National Survey in China. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10:722-50 [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.750722]
19. Lai S, Lu L, Zhou Z, Shen C, Yang X, Zhao Y, et al. The effects of family physician-contracted service on health-related quality of life and equity in health in China. International Journal for Equity in Health 2021;20:1-10 [DOI:10.1186/s12939-020-01348-4]
20. Yang H, Cui Y, Wang X, Yin T, Zheng X, Li R, et al. Effect of family physician contract service on patients' perceived quality of primary child healthcare in urban China: Analysis using propensity score matching. Public Health 2025;242:124-30 [DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.015]
21. Ye J, Feng J, Li X, Qu G, Lei Z, Jiang H, et al. Public trust in general practitioners and its association with primary care contracts: a cross-sectional study of community residents in China. Public Health 2024;231:55-63 [DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.014]
22. Alenezi FS, Alsagheir AI, Alzubaidi LM, Alharbi SS, Al-Saedi WS, Hassanein MH, et al. The temporary contracting and visiting doctors program in the Saudi Ministry of Health: development, reform and outputs. Materia Socio-Medica 2022;34:278 [DOI:10.5455/msm.2022.34.278-283]
23. Absori A, Quinncilla KH, Rizka R, Budiono A, Surbakti N. Doctor Placement's Policy and Its Implications in Indonesia: Legal Qualitative Study. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2022;10:386-91 [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8692]
24. Mulyanto J, Wibowo Y, Kringos DS. Exploring general practitioners' perceptions about the primary care gatekeeper role in Indonesia. BMC Family Practice 2021;22:0-1 [DOI:10.1186/s12875-020-01365-w]
25. University M. Visiting Professionals Programmeguidance Document 2020. Available from: https://mft.nhs.uk/app/uploads/2020/08/Visiting-Professional-Programme-Guidance-Document.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2023]
26. Spooner S, Gibson J, Checkland K, McBride A, Hodgson DE, Hann M, et al. Regional variation in practitioner employment in general practices in England: a comparative analysis. British Journal of General Practice 2020;70:e164-e71 [DOI:10.3399/bjgp20X708185]
27. Smits M, Peters Y, Broers S, Keizer E, Wensing M, Giesen P. Association between general practice characteristics and use of out-of-hours GP cooperatives. BMC Family Practice 2015;16:1-7 [DOI:10.1186/s12875-015-0266-1]
28. Bes JM, Flinterman LE, González AI, Batenburg RS. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in European medical deserts: a systematic review. Rural and Remote Health 2023;23:1-11 [DOI:10.22605/RRH7477]
29. Henry LR, Hooker RS, Yates KL. The role of physician assistants in rural health care: a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Rural Health 2011;220-279 [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00325.x]
30. Hutchinson L, Marks T, Pittilo M. The physician assistant: would the US model meet the needs of the NHS? British Medical Journal 2001;323:1244-7 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1244]
31. Patterson E, Del Mar C, Najman J. Nursing's contribution to general practice: general practitioners' and practice nurses' views. Collegian 1999;6:33-9 [DOI:10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60607-1]
32. Halter M, Drennan V, Chattopadhyay K, Carneiro W, Yiallouros J, De Lusignan S, et al. The contribution of physician assistants in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:1-13 [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-223]
33. Hooker RS, Everett CM. The contributions of physician assistants in primary care systems. Health & Social Care in the Community 2012;20:20-31 [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01021.x]
34. Mash RJ, Von Pressentin KB, Esterhuizen TM. Examining the influence of family physician supply on district health system performance in South Africa: An ecological analysis of key health indicators. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine 2017;9:1-10 [DOI:10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1298]
35. Pestana J, Frutuoso J, Costa E, Fonseca F. Heterogeneity in physician's job preferences in a dual practice context-Evidence from a DCE. Social Science & Medicine 2024;343:116551 [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116551]
36. Ostini R, McGrail MR, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Hill P, O'Sullivan B, Selvey LA, et al. Building a sustainable rural physician workforce. Medical Journal of Australia 2021;215:S5-S33 [DOI:10.5694/mja2.51122]
37. Mohebbifar R, Akbarirad F, Ranjbar M, Rafiei S. What do Iranian general practitioners expect from family physician contracts? Family Medicine and Community Health 2019;7:e000038 [DOI:10.1136/fmch-2018-000038]
38. Bangdiwala SI, Fonn S, Okoye O, Tollman S. Workforce resources for health in developing countries. Public Health Reviews 2010;32:296-318 [DOI:10.1007/BF03391604]
39. Hilo AA, McPeak J. Addressing concerns of access and distribution of health workforce: a discrete choice experiment to develop rural attraction and retention strategies in southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24:1603 [DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11971-4]
40. Brown MC, Crampton P. New Zealand policy strategies concerning the funding of general practitioner care. Health Policy 1997;41:87-104 [DOI:10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00016-X]
41. Rakel RE. The family physician. 8 th Edition, Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, 2011:3-16 [DOI:10.1016/B978-1-4377-1160-8.10001-6]
42. Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Søndergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2012;25:S34-S8 [DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110216]
43. Yoshida S, Matsumoto M, Kashima S, Koike S, Tazuma S, Maeda T. Geographical distribution of family physicians in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice 2019;20:1-7 [DOI:10.1186/s12875-019-1040-6]
44. Veitch C, Harte J, Hays R, Pashen D, Clark S. Community participation in the recruitment and retention of rural doctors: methodological and logistical considerations. Australian Journal of Rural Health 1999;7:206-11 [DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1584.1999.00213.x]
45. Shannon GW, Cutchin MP. General practitioner distribution and population dynamics: Munich, 1950-1990. Social Science & Medicine 1994;39:23-38 [DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90163-5]
46. Hasvold T. Denmark. In: Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459028[Accessed 10 October 2023]
47. McKay M, Lavergne MR, Lea AP, Le M, Grudniewicz A, Blackie D, et al. Government policies targeting primary care physician practice from 1998-2018 in three Canadian provinces: a jurisdictional scan. Health Policy 2022;126:565-75 [DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.006]
48. McDermott I, Spooner S, Checkland K. Employment and deployment of additional roles staff in general practice: a realist evaluation of what works for whom, how, and why. The British Journal of General Practice 2025; 2024:0562 [DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0562]
49. Bashar F, Islam R, Khan SM, Hossain S, Sikder AA, Yusuf SS, et al. Making doctors stay: Rethinking doctor retention policy in a contracted-out primary healthcare setting in urban Bangladesh. Plos one 2022;17:e0262358 [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0262358]
50. Evidence Synthesis and Guiding Document for Primary Care Delivery: Collaborative family practice team-based care & health homes. Available from https://www.nshealth.ca/documents-and-reports/strengthening-primary-health-care system-nova-scotia [Accessed 4 October 2023]
51. Ammi M, Diop M, Strumpf E. Explaining primary care physicians' decision to quit patient‐centered medical homes: Evidence from Quebec, Canada. Health Services Research 2019;54:367-78 [DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13120]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |