The application of survival forests in the study of the most important determinants of the first marriage survival of divorced women with children - Payesh (Health Monitor)
Wed, Jun 4, 2025
OPEN ACCESS
Volume 23, Issue 5 (September-October 2024)                   Payesh 2024, 23(5): 759-769 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bagheri A, Saadati M. The application of survival forests in the study of the most important determinants of the first marriage survival of divorced women with children. Payesh 2024; 23 (5) :759-769
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2256-en.html
1- National Institute for Population Research, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (770 Views)
Objective(s): Divorce as an important social harm has always been the focus of investigators and policymakers as it affects women compared to males. Therefore, considering the importance and prominent role of women in the family and society, the present article aimed to examine the most important determinants of the first marriage survival of divorced women with children.
Methods: In a cross-sectional survey conducted by the Civil Registry Organization in 2017-2018, the information of those who referred to the offices of the provincial centers for divorce registration was collected using a questionnaire. Considering the large number of predictors and the ineffectiveness of classic survival analysis methods in big data modeling, the present study investigated the most important factors, including women and their spouses, their families and provincial macro variables, affecting the first marriage survival of 756 women with children using survival forests using R software.
Results: Based on the highest value of Harrell's coordination index (0.8412), the lowest mean prediction error (0.0885) and the lowest value of integrated Brier score (0.038), the algorithm of random survival forest with log rank split rule (RSF1) in investigating factors affecting the first marriage survival of these women was more efficient. The findings showed that based on variable importance and minimum depth indicators, the first child’s age was the most important variable in examining their first marriage survival.
Conclusions: Since big data are analyzed in many medical and social studies, survival forests can be used as an efficient method to identify the most important predictors and reduce their dimensions, and then use classical survival analysis methods for modeling.

Full-Text [PDF 1249 kb]   (289 Downloads)    
type of study: Quazi Experimental | Subject: Social Determinants of Health
Received: 2023/08/19 | Accepted: 2024/08/31 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/09/8 | Published: 2024/10/8

References
1. Bani Hashemi F, Alimandgari M, Kazmipour Sh, Gholami Fesharaki M. Investigating the demographic, social and economic factors affecting the probability of divorce in Iran in 2015. Demographic Association Letter 2018; 14: 7-43 [Persian]
2. Azadi Sh, Sahami S, Ghahramani Z, Gholipour G. Evaluation of social factors underlying emotional divorce among female employees of Gachsaran oil exploitation company. Women and Health 2018; 1: 101-117 [Persian]
3. Hosseini F, Rezapour M, Ismat Saatlou M. Investigating the effective factors in increasing the divorce rate (case study: separated couples of Sarpol Zahab city, Kermanshah province). Social Work Quarterly 2015; 4: 41-33 [Persian]
4. Yazdakhasi H, Mansouri N, Alizadeh M, Ahmadabadi Z. Investigating feelings of desire and guilt with stress, depression and anxiety of divorce applicants, Isfahan and Arak cities. Family Research Quarterly 2008; 4: 263-275 [Persian]
5. Rezazadeh S. M. R, Bahrami Ehsan H, Fazil M, Fallah M. Investigating background factors and causes affecting divorce: an exploratory analysis. Psychological Sciences 2017; 17:774-765 [Persian]
6. Vasudevan B, Devi G, Bhaskar A, Areekal B, Lucas A, Chintha C. Causes of divorce: A descriptive study from central Kerala. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015; 4: 3418-3426 [DOI:10.14260/jemds/2015/494]
7. Navabakhsh M, Tamiz R, Bagheri Z. Investigating and comparing the attitude of the community towards addiction treatment (case study: Tabriaz); 2011. In: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Social Harms of Iran. 1th Edition, Sociological Association of Iran: Iran, 2013[Persian]
8. Sadeghi R. Social economic factors affecting the divorce of young people in Iran. Strategic Studies of Sport and Youth 2015; 15: 189-205 [Persian]
9. Akhundi M, Ismaili M, Kazemian S. Prediction of positive psychological states in adjustment after divorce of divorced women. Journal of Social Studies of Women's Psychology 2016; 15:137-154 [Persian]
10. Shakuri R. Investigating the divorce incident and its developments in Iran 1986-2006, a case study of Qom province. Master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University: Tehran, Iran 2011 [Persian]
11. Arab S. M, Ebrahimzadeh R, Maruti A. Designing a meta-combination model of factors affecting divorce with a systematic review of previous studies. Iranian Specialized Journal of Epidemiology 2013; 10: 10-22 [Persian]
12. Smith S, Maas I, Tubergen V. F. Irreconcilable differences? Ethnic intermarriage and divorce in the Netherlands 1995-2008. Social Science Research 2012; 41: 1126-37 [DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.02.004]
13. Larson J. H, Holman T. B. Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Journal of Family Relations 1994; 43: 228- 237 [DOI:10.2307/585327]
14. Rosta L. Investigating the social causes of divorce tendency among women referring to Shiraz family court. Women and Society Quarterly 2010; 1: 77-104 [Persian]
15. Bukharai A. Sociology of silent lives in Iran. 1st Edition, Pejhwak Jamie: Tehran, 2016 [Persian]
16. Azimi Rasta M, Abedzad Nobarian M. Investigating factors affecting the occurrence of emotional divorce between couples in the family. Iranian Sociological Studies Quarterly 2012; 3: 31- 46 [Persian]
17. Askari Nadoshan A, Shams Ghahfarakhi M, Shams Ghafarakhi F. An analysis of socio-economic characteristics related to divorce in Iran. Strategic Researches of Iran's Social Issues 2018; 8: 1-16 [Persian]
18. Imanzadeh V, Mohib N, Abdi R, Honarmand Azimi M. Identifying factors affecting divorce and presenting a model for predicting divorce using the decision tree algorithm. Applied Psychology Research Quarterly 2021; 12: 247-263 [Persian]
19. Xu Q, Yu J, Qiu Z. The impact of children on divorce risk. The Journal of Chinese Sociology 2015; 2: 1-20 [DOI:10.1186/s40711-015-0003-0]
20. Mahdavi M S, Tamiz R. Sociological diagnostic analysis of the structural characteristics of the hemphil group in marriage survival (case study of Tabriz city). Iranian Social Development Studies 2011; 5: 55-72 [Persian]
21. Keiley M, Martin N. Survival analysis in family research. Journal of Family Psychology 2005; 19: 142-156 [DOI:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.142]
22. Saadati M, Bagheri A. Survival analysis methods in the analysis of population events. National Institute for Population Research: Tehran, 2014 [In Persian], https://nipr.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/07
23. Saadati M, Bagheri A. Ideal first birth interval: A study of pre-marriage Youths. Payesh 2017; 16:239-250 [Persian]
24. Bagheri A, Saadati M. The use of survival random forest in the analysis of the distance between marriage and childbearing. National Institute for Population Research: Tehran, 2018 [Persian], https://nipr.ac.ir/2018
25. Saadati M, Bagheri A. Analyzing First Birth Interval by a CART Survival Tree. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2020; 14: 247-255
26. Saadati M, Bagheri A. Comparison of Survival Forests in Analyzing First Birth Interval. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal 2020; 7 : 11-23 [DOI:10.29252/jorjanibiomedj.7.3.11]
27. Sahoo A. J, Kumar Y. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods. Technology and Health Care 2014; 22: 531-45 [DOI:10.3233/THC-140816]
28. Aurangabad M. Comparative Analysis of Classification Techniques on Soil Data to Predict Fertility Rate for Aurangabad District INDIA. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science 2014; 3: 200-203
29. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001; 45: 5-32 [DOI:10.1023/A:1010933404324]
30. Miao F, Cai Y.P, Zhang Y.T, Li C.Y. Is random survival forest an alternative to Cox proportional model on predicting cardiovascular disease? In: Lacković, I., Vasic, D. (eds) 6th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 45. Springer, Cham, 2015 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11128-5_184]
31. Adham D, Abbasgholizadeh N, Abazari M. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer using a random survival forest. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2017;18:129-34
32. Bagheri A, Saadati M. Event History Analysis by SAS Software. 1st Edition, National Institute for Population Research: Tehran, 2023 [Persian]
33. Ishwaran H, Kogalur U. B, Blackstone E. H, Lauer M. S. Random Survival Forests. Annals of Applied Statistics 2008; 2: 841-860 [DOI:10.1214/08-AOAS169]
34. Ishwaran H, Kogalur U.B. Fast Unified Random Forests for Survival, Regression, and Classification. R package version 3.2.0. 2023: 1-130
35. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2006; 15: 651-674 [DOI:10.1198/106186006X133933]
36. Ishwaran H, Lu M. Standard errors and confidence intervals for variable importance in random forest regression, classification, and survival. Statistics in medicine 2019;38: 558-82. [DOI:10.1002/sim.7803]
37. Hirschberger G, Srivastava S, Marsh P, Cowan C. P, Cowan P. A. Attachment, marital satisfaction, and divorce during the first fifteen years of parenthood. Personal Relationships 2009; 16: 401-420 [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01230.x]
38. Abdel-Sater R. Marriage Dissolution in the United States: A Survival Analysis Approach. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 2022; 63: 1-27 [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2022.2042788]
39. Thornton A. Children and marital stability. Journal of Marriage and Family 1977; 39:531-540 [DOI:10.2307/350907]
40. Lyngstad T.H, Jalovaara M. A. Review of the Antecedents of :union: Dissolution. Demographic Research 2010; 23: 255-292 [DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.10]
41. Steele F, Kallis C, Goldstein H, Joshi H. The Relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography 2005; 42: 647-673 [DOI:10.1353/dem.2005.0038]
42. Lin IF, Brown SL, Mellencamp KA. The Roles of Gray Divorce and Subsequent Repartnering for Parent-Adult Child Relationships. The Journals of Gerontol Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences 2022; 77: 212-223 [DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbab139]
43. Brown S.L., Lin I-F. The gray divorce revolution: rising divorce among middle-aged and older adults, 1990-2010. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2012; 67: 731-741 [DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbs089]
44. Lin IF, Brown S.L, Wright M.R, Hammersmith A.M. Antecedents of Gray Divorce: A Life Course Perspective. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 2018; 73: 1022-1031

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Payesh (Health Monitor)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb