Ethics code: IR.IUMS.REC.1398.735
Clinical trials code: TCTR20200213002
1- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University Medical and Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University Medical and Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (21 Views)
Objective(s): Sexual function is influenced by a complex interplay of environmental, social, psychological, and physical factors. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women is significant. Given that sexual self-efficacy is a key factor affecting sexual function, there is a need for an effective and sustainable intervention model. Additionally, involving spouses in educational sessions seems helpful. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of couples’ education based on social cognitive theory on postmenopausal women’s sexual self-efficacy.
Methods: This study was a parallel quasi-experimental one. Participants included 70 couples, comprising postmenopausal women visiting six comprehensive health centers in Qom city. Convenience sampling was employed. Eligible postmenopausal women and their spouses were assigned to an intervention group (35 couples) that participated in training based on social cognitive theory, which consisted of six 90-minute sessions conducted weekly over six weeks. The control group (35 couples) attended a single session covering nutrition, physical activity, weight management, and blood pressure education. Data were collected through demographic information and a sexual self-efficacy questionnaire, which was administered exclusively to postmenopausal women before the intervention, immediately after, and two months post-intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and repeated measures two-way ANOVA.
Results: Before the intervention, the mean sexual self-efficacy score was (51.07 ± 6.31) for the intervention group and (52.93 ± 5.48) for the control group, with no significant difference observed between them. Immediately after the intervention, the mean sexual self-efficacy score in the intervention group increased to (84.78 ± 5.30), while the control group scored (50.51 ± 6.02), indicating a significant difference between the two groups. Two months post-training, the mean sexual self-efficacy score for the intervention group rose to (95.14 ± 5.99), compared to (54.72 ± 5.86) for the control group, again showing a significant difference. The results indicated that the variables of time (P=0.01), group (P=0.007), and the interaction between time and group (P=0.001) demonstrated significant differences.
Conclusion: The educational intervention based on social cognitive theory was effective in enhancing the sexual self-efficacy of postmenopausal women in Qom who participated in the training sessions with their husbands. After completing six training sessions, both immediately and two months later, there was a noticeable increase in the sexual self-efficacy of these women. Future studies are encouraged to evaluate sexual self-efficacy in men who undergo training alongside their spouses.
Methods: This study was a parallel quasi-experimental one. Participants included 70 couples, comprising postmenopausal women visiting six comprehensive health centers in Qom city. Convenience sampling was employed. Eligible postmenopausal women and their spouses were assigned to an intervention group (35 couples) that participated in training based on social cognitive theory, which consisted of six 90-minute sessions conducted weekly over six weeks. The control group (35 couples) attended a single session covering nutrition, physical activity, weight management, and blood pressure education. Data were collected through demographic information and a sexual self-efficacy questionnaire, which was administered exclusively to postmenopausal women before the intervention, immediately after, and two months post-intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and repeated measures two-way ANOVA.
Results: Before the intervention, the mean sexual self-efficacy score was (51.07 ± 6.31) for the intervention group and (52.93 ± 5.48) for the control group, with no significant difference observed between them. Immediately after the intervention, the mean sexual self-efficacy score in the intervention group increased to (84.78 ± 5.30), while the control group scored (50.51 ± 6.02), indicating a significant difference between the two groups. Two months post-training, the mean sexual self-efficacy score for the intervention group rose to (95.14 ± 5.99), compared to (54.72 ± 5.86) for the control group, again showing a significant difference. The results indicated that the variables of time (P=0.01), group (P=0.007), and the interaction between time and group (P=0.001) demonstrated significant differences.
Conclusion: The educational intervention based on social cognitive theory was effective in enhancing the sexual self-efficacy of postmenopausal women in Qom who participated in the training sessions with their husbands. After completing six training sessions, both immediately and two months later, there was a noticeable increase in the sexual self-efficacy of these women. Future studies are encouraged to evaluate sexual self-efficacy in men who undergo training alongside their spouses.
type of study: Quazi Experimental |
Subject:
Reproductive Health
Received: 2025/01/4 | Accepted: 2025/03/12 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/06/6
Received: 2025/01/4 | Accepted: 2025/03/12 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/06/6
References
1. Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G, Norton N, Halbout P, Cooper C, et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Archives of Osteoporosis 2020;15:1-21 [DOI:10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y]
2. Lee Y, Lee M. Appearance management effect and self-conquest of physical and psychological changes in middle-aged women's lifespan. Art Humanities Open Access Journal 2020;4:75-79 [DOI:10.15406/ahoaj.2020.04.00157]
3. Scavello I, Maseroli E, Di Stasi V, Vignozzi L. Sexual Health in Menopause. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 2019; 2:1-18 [DOI:10.3390/medicina55090559]
4. Nappi RE, Cucinella L. Menopause and Sexual Health: Hormones, Aging or Both? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;10: 1-14 [DOI:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000910]
5. Throsby K, & Roberts C. Bodies of Change: Menopause as Biopsychosocial Process. In V. 1st Edition, Bristol University Press: UK. 2024 [DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781529215700.003.0002]
6. Khani S, Azizi M, Elyasi F, Kamali M, Moosazadeh M. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in the different menopausal stages: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Sexual Health 2021;33:439-472 [persian] [DOI:10.1080/19317611.2021.1926039]
7. DeLamater J. Sexual expression in later life: A review and synthesis. Journal of sex research 2012;49:125-141 [DOI:10.1080/00224499.2011.603168]
8. Naeij E, Moosazadeh M, Khani S, Firouzi A, Barzegari S. Effect of counseling and educational interventions on sexual functioning of women with natural menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research 2019;9: 40-51[Persian]
9. Jaafarpour M, Rashan N, Bahmani M, Direkvand-Moghadam A. The effect of sexual counseling based on the PLISSIT model on improving the sexual function of postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Climacteric 2024; 28: 74-80 [DOI:10.1080/13697137.2024.2429426]
10. Im E-O, Lee Y, Chee E, Chee W. Web-based interventions for menopause: a systematic integrated literature review. Maturitas 2017;95:24-30 [DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.009]
11. Afiyanti Y. Sexual self-efficacy: Affection, sexual communication, and self-acceptance as significant factors related to sexual function on menopausal women in Indonesia. Enfermeria Clinica 2019;29:551-555 [DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.085]
12. Bond JC, Morrison DM, Hawes SE. Sexual self-efficacy and entitlement to pleasure: The association of the female sexual subjectivity inventory with sexual risk taking and experience of orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2020;491029-1038 [DOI:10.1007/s10508-019-01563-3]
13. Sheykhesmaeili D, Golmohammadian M, Hojjatkhah SM. The role of personality characteristics and marital interaction stability in the prediction of marital disaffection with mediating sexual self-efficacy in married women. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research 2019;13:59-68
14. Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action: first ed ,Taylor & Francis, New York 2014. [DOI:10.4324/9781315800820]
15. Wong EL, Huang F, Cheung AW, Wong CK. The impact of menopause on the sexual health of Chinese Cantonese women: A mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2018;74:72-84 [DOI:10.1111/jan.13568]
16. Spector A, Li Z, He L, Badawy Y, Desai R. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 2024; 353:460-472 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.048]
17. Atema V, Van Leeuwen M, Kieffer JM, Oldenburg HS, Van Beurden M, Gerritsma MA, et al. Efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-induced menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019;37:809-822 [DOI:10.1200/JCO.18.00655]
18. Chen T-L, Chang S-C, Huang C-Y, Wang H-H. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on quality of life and menopausal symptoms in menopausal women: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2021;147:1-15 [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110515]
19. Fujimoto K. Effectiveness of coaching for enhancing the health of menopausal Japanese women. Journal of Women & Aging 2017;29: 216-229 [DOI:10.1080/08952841.2015.1137434]
20. Monfaredi Z, Malakouti J, Farvareshi M, Mirghafourvand M. Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on mood, sleep quality and quality of life in menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22:1-12 [DOI:10.1186/s12888-022-03768-8]
21. Barlow DH. Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. The Neurotic Paradox 2020;1:183-198 [DOI:10.4324/9781315724539-15]
22. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982; 37, 122. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122]
23. Abdullah, S. M. Social cognitive theory: A Bandura thought review published in 1982-2012. Psikodimensia 2019; 18, 85-100 [DOI:10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708]
24. Rad RE, Hosseini Z, Mohseni S, Mohammadi M, Nikparvar M, Aghamolaei T. Design, implementation and evaluation of an intervention based on a social cognitive theory of physical activity and nutritional behaviors in middle-aged people at the risk of coronary artery disease in Bandar Abbas: A study protocol. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2023;12:1-10 [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1364_22]
25. Steinke, E. E., Mosack, V., Hertzog, J. & Wright, D. W. A Social‐Cognitive Sexual Counseling Intervention Post‐MI-Development and Pilot Testing. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 2013; 49: 162-170 [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2012.00345.x]
26. Ebrahimi, M. & Rahimi, B. The effect of self-efficacy counseling on the management of menopausal symptoms in psychological dimension in perimenopause women referred to health centers in Mahabad city. Menopause 2019;: 93-97
27. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics 2010;1:100-107 [DOI:10.4103/0976-500X.72352]
28. Manesh MJ, Moghadam Z. The experiences of menopause through the lens of Iranian women: Content analysis study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2011;5:1543-1548
29. Schwarzer, R. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. 1st Edition, Taylor & Francis, Routledge: New York, 2014 [DOI:10.4324/9781315800820]
30. Maasoumi R, Dastaran F. Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess the Iranian women's sexual self-efficacy. Nursing Practice Today 2019;6:176-189 [DOI:10.18502/npt.v6i4.1940]
31. Khazaeian S, Navidian A, Rahiminezhad M. Effect of mindfulness on sexual self-efficacy and sexual satisfaction among Iranian postmenopausal women: a quasi-experimental study. Sexual Medicine 2023;11:1-17 [DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfad031]
32. van Driel CM, de Bock GH, Schroevers MJ, Mourits M. Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for menopausal symptoms after risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (pursue study): a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2019;126:402-411 [DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.15471]
33. Kamalak H, Aksoy Derya Y. The effects of motivational interviewing on sexual quality of life and sexual self-efficacy in postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction. Menopause 2024;31:862-870 [DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000002418]
34. Naeij E, Moosazadeh M, Khani S, Firouzi A, Barzegari S. Effect of counseling and educational interventions on sexual functioning of women with natural menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause 2019;9:40-51
35. Baranowski T, Perry CL, Parcel GS. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. Health behavior and health education: Theory, Research, and Practice 2002;3:165-184
36. Steinke EE, Mosack V, Hertzog J, Wright DW. A Social‐Cognitive Sexual Counseling Intervention Post‐MI-Development and Pilot Testing. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 2013;49:162-170 [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2012.00345.x]
37. Štulhofer A, Hinchliff S, Træen B. Relationship intimacy, sexual distress, and help-seeking for sexual problems among older European couples: a hybrid dyadic approach. International journal of Impotence Research 2020;32:525-534 [DOI:10.1038/s41443-019-0214-z]
38. Abadi FZM, Salehi S, Mousavi MS. Relation between sexual self-concept and sexual distress in women with multiple sclerosis who referred to Shahid Sadoughi Hospital of Yazd in 2017. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2019; 27: 1835-1845
39. Shepard LA, Penuel WR, Pellegrino JW. Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2018;37:21-34 [DOI:10.1111/emip.12189]
40. Jamali S, Rahmanian A, Javadpour S. Examining the sexual function and related attitudes among aged women: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine 2016;14:29-38 [DOI:10.29252/ijrm.14.1.29]
41. Sunila K. Midlife sexuality concerns and care-An Indian perspective. Maturitas 2015;82:320. [DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.06.021]
42. Pâquet M, Rosen NO, Steben M, Mayrand M-H, Santerre-Baillargeon M, Bergeron S. Daily anxiety and depressive symptoms in couples coping with vulvodynia: Associations with women's pain, women's sexual function, and both partners' sexual distress. The Journal of Pain 2018;19:552-561 [DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.12.264]
43. Panzeri M, Ferrucci R, Cozza A, Fontanesi L. Changes in sexuality and quality of couple relationship during the Covid-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology 2020;11:1-8 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565823]
44. Bülbül T, Mucuk S, Dolanbay M, Turhan İ. Do complaints related to menopause affect sexuality and marital adjustment? Sexual and Relationship Therapy 2020; 36:465-479 [DOI:10.1080/14681994.2020.1813886]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |