Volume 22, Issue 5 (September-October 2023)
Payesh 2023, 22(5): 523-533 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.ACECR.IBCRC.REC.1400.027
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mozafari Kermani R, Sadighi J, Tavousi M, Rostami R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight (VLBW) children aged 3-5 years old born in 2018 in Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2023; 22 (5) :523-533
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2166-en.html
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2166-en.html
1- Health Metrics Research Center, Iraninan Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1105 Views)
Objective(s) : With progress in medical care, the rate of premature birth has increased and the mortality rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) babies has decreased. However, there is an increased incidence of disabilities in survivors, including neurodevelopmental delay, particularly in infants born very prematurely. This study aimed to assess the neurodevelopment in such children.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on non-randomized sample of children aged 3 to 5 years with weight less than 1500 grams or the mother's pregnancy lasted in less than 32 weeks in 2018 and born in one of the hospitals in Tehran, Iran. and alive at the study commence. They were evaluated by the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) in 5 developmental fields. Data was collected by completing a general questionnaire, the ASQ, and using the hospital records. The data were analyzed by SPSS-22 software, and statistical tests included descriptive and analytical tests such as chi-square and t-test.
Results: Out of the total number of births, the data for 220 VLBW children were eligible for analysis. Of these, 12 children (5.7%) had at least one developmental disorder in the five investigated fields including: 4.2% of the children had neurological developmental delayed in communication, 2.4% in gross motor, 2.4% in fine motor, 2.8% in problem solving, and 2.8% in the personal-social aspects. There was no significant relationship between gender, length of pregnancy, and parents' education level with children's developmental disorders. There was a significant difference between the rehabilitation status of VLBW children and developmental delay (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the VLBW children are at higher risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. It is recommended that such children undergo physical, neurological, and developmental evaluations at different ages.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on non-randomized sample of children aged 3 to 5 years with weight less than 1500 grams or the mother's pregnancy lasted in less than 32 weeks in 2018 and born in one of the hospitals in Tehran, Iran. and alive at the study commence. They were evaluated by the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) in 5 developmental fields. Data was collected by completing a general questionnaire, the ASQ, and using the hospital records. The data were analyzed by SPSS-22 software, and statistical tests included descriptive and analytical tests such as chi-square and t-test.
Results: Out of the total number of births, the data for 220 VLBW children were eligible for analysis. Of these, 12 children (5.7%) had at least one developmental disorder in the five investigated fields including: 4.2% of the children had neurological developmental delayed in communication, 2.4% in gross motor, 2.4% in fine motor, 2.8% in problem solving, and 2.8% in the personal-social aspects. There was no significant relationship between gender, length of pregnancy, and parents' education level with children's developmental disorders. There was a significant difference between the rehabilitation status of VLBW children and developmental delay (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the VLBW children are at higher risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. It is recommended that such children undergo physical, neurological, and developmental evaluations at different ages.
Keywords: Neurodevelopmental delay, very low birth weight children, 3 to 5 year old children, Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
type of study: Descriptive |
Subject:
Health Metrics
Received: 2023/06/6 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | ePublished ahead of print: 2023/07/29 | Published: 2023/08/28
Received: 2023/06/6 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | ePublished ahead of print: 2023/07/29 | Published: 2023/08/28
References
1. Serenius F, Källén K, Blennow M, Ewald U. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. Journal American Medical Association 2013; 309:1810-20 [DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.3786]
2. Stephens BE Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the premature infant. Pediatric Clinics of North America 2009; 56:631-46 [DOI:10.1016/j.pcl.2009.03.005]
3. Serenius F, Ewald U, Farooqi A, Fellman V. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Among Extremely Preterm Infants 6.5 Years After Active Perinatal Care in Sweden. Journal American Medical Association 2016;170: 954-963 [DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1210]
4. Pascal A, Govaert P, Oostra A, Naulaers G. Neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants born over the past decade: a meta-analytic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2018; 60: 342-355 [DOI:10.1111/dmcn.13675]
5. Vohr BR, Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41: 241-55 [DOI:10.1016/j.clp.2013.09.003]
6. Woythaler M. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of the late preterm infant. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2019; 24: 54-59 [DOI:10.1016/j.siny.2018.10.002]
7. Schonhaut L, Armijo I, Pérez M. Gestational age and developmental risk in moderately and late preterm and early term infants. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e835-41 [DOI:10.1542/peds.2014-1957]
8. Aita M, Gwenaëlle De Clifford F , Lavallée A, Feeley N, Stremler R, Rioux É, Proulx M-H. Effectiveness of interventions on early neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Central Pediatrics 2021; 21: 210 [DOI:10.1186/s12887-021-02559-6]
9. Prakash Upadhyay R, Naik G, Shankar Choudhary T, Chowdhury R, Taneja S, Bhandari N, Carlos Martines J, Bahl R, Kishan Bhan M. Cognitive and motor outcomes in children born low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from South Asia. BioMed Central Pediatr 2019; 19: 35 [DOI:10.1186/s12887-019-1408-8]
10. Sun Kim H, Kim E-K, Park H-K, Ahn D-H, Kim M J, and Lee H-J. Cognitive Outcomes of Children with Very Low Birth Weight at 3 to 5 Years of Age. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020; 35: 4 [DOI:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e4]
11. Pierrat V, Marchand-Martin L, Arnaud C, Kaminski M, Resche-Rigon M, Lebeaux C, Bodeau-Livinec F, Morgan AS, Goffinet F, Marret S, Pierre-Yves A. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. British Medical Journal 2017; 358: j3448 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.j3448]
12. Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J, Johnson SJ. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. British Medical Journal 2012; 345: e7961 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.e7961]
13. Lugli L, Pugliese M, Plessi C et al. Neuroprem: the Neuro-developmental outcome of very low birth weight infants in an Italian region. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2020; 46: 26 [DOI:10.1186/s13052-020-0787-7]
14. Sarda SP, Sarri G, Siffel C. Global prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment following extremely preterm birth: a systematic literature review. Journal of International Medical Research 2021; 49: 1-27 [DOI:10.1177/03000605211028026]
15. Zer S, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Miodownik S, Pariente G. Identifying the Critical Threshold for Long-Term Pediatric Neurological Hospitalizations of the Offspring in Preterm Delivery. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2021;10: 19-29 [DOI:10.3390/jcm10132919]
16. Nuntnarumit P, Intachumpoo J. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of VLBW Children at 6-8 Years of Age. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2014; 2: A463-A464 [DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1283]
17. Schlapbach L, Adams M, Proietti E, Aebischer M, Grunt S, Borradori-Tolsa C, Bickle-Graz M, Ulrich Bucher H, Latal B and Natalucci G, Swiss Neonatal Network & Follow-up Group. Outcome at two years of age in a Swiss national cohort of extremely preterm infants born between 2000 and 2008. BioMed Central Pediatr 2012;12:198 [DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-12-198]
18. Sajedi F, Habibollahi A. Standardization and validation of the ASQ developmental disordersscreening tool in children of Tehran city. Tehran University Medical Journal, October 2012; Vol. 70, No. 7: 436-446 [Pershian]
19. Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Kraskian Mojembari A. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Standardization of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) in Iranian Children. Iran Journal Public Health 2013; 42: 522-8
20. Yu LM, Hey E, Doyle LW. Evaluation of The Ages and Stages Questionnaires in identifying children with neurosensory disability in the Magpie Trial follow-up study. Acta Paediatrica 2007; 96: 1803-8 [DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00517.x]
21. Toghyani R, Sharafi Shorabi F, Sharafi Shorabi H, Ghahraman Tabrizi S H. Check the status of the development of children under age 5 in rural areas of Isfahan using the ASQ questionnaire in 2012-2013 year. Journal of Medicine and life 2015; 8: 169-173
22. Ghazavi Z, Abdeyazdan Z, Shiravi E. Talakob S. Developmental skills of 36-60-month-old children in Isfahan daycare centers in 2013. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 2015; 20: 594-8 [DOI:10.4103/1735-9066.164511]
23. Karimi M, Fallah R, Dehghanpoor A, Mirzaei M. Developmental status of 5-year-old moderate low birth weight children. Brain and Development 2011; 33: 651-5 [DOI:10.1016/j.braindev.2010.10.022]
24. Sharafi R, Hassanzadeh Rad A, Akrami N, Aminzadeh V. Developmental Status of Five-Year-old Children with Very-Low-Birth-Weight. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology 2021;15:77-84
25. Gisele E Oliveira, Lívia C Magalhães, Luci F T Salmela. Relationship between very low birth weight, environmental factors, and motor and cognitive development of children of 5 and 6 years old. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia 2011;15:138-45 [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552011000200009]
26. Tavasoli A, Aliabadi F, Eftekhari R. Motor developmental status of moderately low birth weight preterm infants. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 2014; 24: 581-6
27. Mohammadzadeh A, Jafarzade M, Shah Farhat A, Amiri R, Esmaeli H. Ophthalmic, hearing, speaking and school readiness outcomes in low birth weight and normal birth weight primary school children in Mashhad-Iran. Acta Medica Iranica 2011;49:28-32
28. Diane Frome L, Caitlin MI, Lee J, Barlowd SM. Language, Motor, and Cognitive Outcomes of Toddlers Who Were Born Preterm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2020; 29: 625-637 [DOI:10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00049]
29. Lorenz J M, Wooliever D E, Jetton J R, Paneth N. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1998;152: 425-35 [DOI:10.1001/archpedi.152.5.425]
30. Modi N, Ashby D, Battersby C. Developing routinely recorded clinical data from electronic patient records as a national resource to improve neonatal health care: the Medicines for Neonates research programme. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research 2019; 7: 6 [DOI:10.3310/pgfar07060]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |