Volume 23, Issue 2 (March-April 2024)
Payesh 2024, 23(2): 185-197 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yas A, Mansouri Ghezelhesari E, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The impact of non-pharmacological approaches on post-cesarean ileus: A critical review. Payesh 2024; 23 (2) :185-197
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2227-en.html
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2227-en.html
1- Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (1595 Views)
Objective (s): This study aimed to critically evaluate published clinical trials on the effect of non-pharmacological approaches on post-cesarean ileus.
Methods: Non-pharmacological clinical trials on ileus after cesarean delivery were searched in Pubmed, Web of science, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, SID, Magiran, Iranmedex databases. The key words: Cesarean Delivery, Ileus, Bowel Movements, Passing Gas, Defecation, Bowel Function and Non-Pharmacological Methods were used from 1/1/2011 to 9/25/2023.The Studies were evaluated by the CONSORT checklist of non-pharmacological interventions consisting of six sections, 25 questions and 44 items. SPSS2019 software was used for descriptive data analysis.
Results: A total of 23 articles were critically evaluated. The following non-pharmacological methods were found: nine articles related to chewing gum (40%), five articles related to premature feeding after cesarean section (21%), three articles related to acupressure (13%), two articles related to drinking coffee (9%), one article on exercise (4.5%) and three articles on medicinal plants (13%). The compliance percentage of the articles with Consort criteria was 60% and their mean score was 27±4.4 ranging from 14 to 33. The most discrepancies were in the results and method sections.
Conclusion: The quality of clinical trials on non-pharmacological methods on ileus after cesarean delivery in the last 10 years was intermediate, which suggest the need for more attention by investigators using the standard checklists for reporting studies.
Methods: Non-pharmacological clinical trials on ileus after cesarean delivery were searched in Pubmed, Web of science, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, SID, Magiran, Iranmedex databases. The key words: Cesarean Delivery, Ileus, Bowel Movements, Passing Gas, Defecation, Bowel Function and Non-Pharmacological Methods were used from 1/1/2011 to 9/25/2023.The Studies were evaluated by the CONSORT checklist of non-pharmacological interventions consisting of six sections, 25 questions and 44 items. SPSS2019 software was used for descriptive data analysis.
Results: A total of 23 articles were critically evaluated. The following non-pharmacological methods were found: nine articles related to chewing gum (40%), five articles related to premature feeding after cesarean section (21%), three articles related to acupressure (13%), two articles related to drinking coffee (9%), one article on exercise (4.5%) and three articles on medicinal plants (13%). The compliance percentage of the articles with Consort criteria was 60% and their mean score was 27±4.4 ranging from 14 to 33. The most discrepancies were in the results and method sections.
Conclusion: The quality of clinical trials on non-pharmacological methods on ileus after cesarean delivery in the last 10 years was intermediate, which suggest the need for more attention by investigators using the standard checklists for reporting studies.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery, Ileus, Bowel movements, Bowel function, Passing gas, Defecation, non-Pharmacological approaches
type of study: Systematic Reviw |
Subject:
Reproductive Health
Received: 2023/07/19 | Accepted: 2023/12/4 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/01/20 | Published: 2024/03/10
Received: 2023/07/19 | Accepted: 2023/12/4 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/01/20 | Published: 2024/03/10
References
1. Williams HC, Dellavalle RP. The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2012;132:1008-17 [DOI:10.1038/jid.2011.337]
2. Taddei S. Combination therapy in hypertension: what are the best options according to clinical pharmacology principles and controlled clinical trial evidence? American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 2015;15:185-94 [DOI:10.1007/s40256-015-0116-5]
3. Kusuoka H. Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine. Heart Drug 2002;2:269-72 [DOI:10.1159/000069673]
4. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal Publishing Group 1996;13: 71-75 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71]
5. Szajewska H. Evidence-based medicine and clinical research: both are needed, neither is perfect. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2018;72:13-23 [DOI:10.1159/000487375]
6. Leung GM, Johnston JM, Tin KY, Wong IO, Ho L-M, Lam WW. Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students. British Medical Journal 2003;327:1090-95 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1090]
7. Website. C. http://www.consort-statement.org.(2021.12.14)
8. Moore R, Derry S, McQuay H, Straube S, Aldington D, Wiffen P. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences. Pain 2010;149:173-6 [DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.007]
9. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association 1996;276:637-9 [DOI:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030]
10. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, Group C. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008;148:295-309 [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008]
11. Meerpohl J, Blümle A, Antes G, Ev E. Reporting guidelines are also useful for readers of medical research publications: CONSORT, STARD, STROBE and others. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 2009;134:2078-83 [DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1237560]
12. Jiménez Paneque R, Bachelet VC. Clinical trials and study reporting-CONSORT guidelines at the forefront. Medwave 2015;15:129-134 [DOI:10.5867/medwave.2015.08.6273]
13. Boutron I, Douglas G, Kenneth F, Philippe R. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008; 148:295-306 [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008]
14. Boutron DGA, Moher D , Kenneth F , Philippe R , CONSORT NPT Group. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine 2017; 167:40-7 [DOI:10.7326/M17-0046]
15. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010;11:192-199 [DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32]
16. Sarayloo K, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Critical evaluation of the published clinical trials regarding the effect of complementary medicine on menopausal symptoms. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2018;21:87-98 [Persian]
17. Sharifi F, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Critical appraisal of Published Clinical Trials on "The Effect of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Infertile Women's Pregnancy Rate. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2021;24:146-153 [Persian]
18. Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Shadman, Zh, Ejtahed H, Larijani M. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicines conducted in metabolic disorders in Middle East countries: A systematic review .Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2018;38:61-8 [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2018.04.004]
19. Satoru Shikata TN, Hisakazu Y. Quality of surgical randomized controlled trials for acute cholecystitis: assessment based on CONSORT and additional check items Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surgery 2008;15:297-303 [DOI:10.1007/s00534-007-1268-8]
20. Kun Hyung Kim JWK, Myeong S, Jae Dong L. Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement. BMJ Open 2014; 4:340-46 [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068]
21. Saurav Ghimire EK, Wonku K, Eunyoung K. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. BMCTrials 2012;17:138-145 [DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-77]
22. Chang L, Chang M, Chang HM, Chang AI, Chang F. Clinical and radiological diagnosis of gallstone ileus: a mini review. Emergency Radiology 2018;25:189-96 [DOI:10.1007/s10140-017-1568-5]
23. EuroSurg Collaborative , STARSurg Collaborative. Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery. Journal of British Surgery 2020;107: 161-9 [DOI:10.1002/bjs.11326]
24. Jakubauskas M, Luksaite R, Sileikis A, Strupas K, Poskus T. Gallstone ileus: management and clinical outcomes. Medicina 2019;55:598-603 [DOI:10.3390/medicina55090598]
25. Sarveravan BA, Shokrpour N. Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of randomized controlled trials on pharmacological interventions published in iranian medical journals. Iranian Journal Of Medical Sciences 2017;42:532-36
26. Suri H. Ethical considerations of conducting systematic reviews in educational research. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research 2020;26:41-54 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_3]
27. Abadi F, Shahabinejad M, Abadi F, Kazemi M. Effect of acupressure on symptoms of postoperative ileus after cesarean section. Journal Of Acupuncture And Meridian Studies 2017;10:114-9 [DOI:10.1016/j.jams.2016.11.008]
28. Ogbadua AO, Agida TE, Akaba GO, Akitoye OA, Ekele BA. Early versus delayed oral feeding after uncomplicated cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Nigerian Journal of Surgery 2018;24:16-23 [DOI:10.4103/njs.NJS_26_17]
29. Amiri-Siavoshani M, Shabani A, Saleki S, Tafazzoli Harandi H, Afrakhteh M. Determining the Effect of Early Feeding after Cesarean section Compared with Regular Diet on the Gastrointestinal Function of Women Referred to Tajrish Hospital, Iran. Yasuj University of Medical Sciences Journal 2021;21:80-6 [Persian]
30. Herman A, Santoso B, Yunitasari E. The effect of chewing gum on improving the intestine peristaltic among post cesarean sectio patients at hospital of kendari city. International Journal of Nursing and Health Services 2019;2:158-63 [DOI:10.35654/ijnhs.v2i3.129]
31. Mawson AL, Bumrungphuet S, Manonai J. A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia. International Journal Of Women's Health 2019;11:519-26 [DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S222922]
32. Ali A, Saeed S, Memon AS, Abbasi M, Samo K, Mustafa R. Chewing Aid in Routine Postoperative Orders-Does it reduce Postoperative Ileus after Cesarean Section? A Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences 2019;18:109-12 [DOI:10.22442/jlumhs.191820611]
33. Jakkaew B, Charoenkwan K. Effects of gum chewing on recovery of bowel function following cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2013; 288:255-60 [DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2727-x]
34. Yousefi SS, Sadeghpour O, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Sohrabvand F. The effects of Carum carvi (Bunium persicum Boiss) on early return of bowel motility after Caesarean section: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Journal Of Family & Reproductive Health 2019;13:35-42 [DOI:10.18502/jfrh.v13i1.1611]
35. Khadem E, Shirazi M, Janani L, Rahimi R, Amiri P, Ghorat F. Effect of topical chamomile oil on postoperative bowel activity after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice 2018; 7:128-135 [DOI:10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_17_103]
36. Ledari FM, Barat S, Delavar MA, Banihosini SZ, Khafri S. Chewing sugar-free gum reduces ileus after cesarean section in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2013; 15:330-36 [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.6458]
37. Rashad W, Yousef S. Effect of sugarless gum chewing on intestinal movement after cesarean section. Life Science Journal 2013; 10:3257-61
38. Dandan Zhou BH, Shan He, Xiaogang Li, Hui Gong, Feng Li , and Qiang Wang. Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Accelerates the Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2018;16:102-9 [DOI:10.1155/2018/7341920]
39. Gayathri R, Sagili H, Rajagopalan G, Elamurugan T. Effect of chewing gum on bowel recovery following caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. International Surgery Journal 2020;7:3576-80 [DOI:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20204453]
40. Altraigey A, Ellaithy M, Atia H, Abdelrehim W, Abbas AM, Asiri M. The effect of gum chewing on the return of bowel motility after planned cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2020;33:1670-7 [DOI:10.1080/14767058.2018.1526913]
41. Manzoor S, Hameed A, Tayyab W, Nawaz S, Afzal A. The effect of chewing gum on return of bowel activity after caesarean section: A randomized controlled study. Journal of the Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Pakistan 2018;8:255-60
42. Masood SN, Masood Y, Naim U, Masood MF. A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2014;126:115-9 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023]
43. Liebergall‐Wischnitzer M, Shaphir A, Solnica A, Hochner‐Celnikier D. Are Paula method exercises effective for gastrointestinal reactivation post‐elective cesarean delivery? Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2021;77:2026-32 [DOI:10.1111/jan.14681]
44. Koseoglu SB, Toker MK, Gokbel I, Celikkol O, Gungorduk K. Can coffee consumption be used to accelerate the recovery of bowel function after cesarean section? Randomized prospective trial. Ginekologia Polska 2020;91:85-90 [DOI:10.5603/GP.2020.0014]
45. Supattanarungsi W, Chullapram T. Returning of Bowel Function in Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding after Cesarean Delivery. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2021;9:92-9
46. Tianthong W, Phupong V. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of ginger in the prevention of abdominal distention in post cesarean section patients. Scientific Reports 2018;8:1-5 [DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25200-6]
47. Rabiepoor S, Yas A, Navaei J, Khalkhali HR. Does coffee affect the bowel function after caesarean section? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2018;220:96-99 [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.028]
48. Kira SA, Gul KD. Effect of Acupressure Applied After Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia Postpone the Duration of Taking Analgesics and on The Gastrointestinal System: A Randomized Controlled Trial. EXPLORE 2023; 19:58-64 [DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2021.12.012]
49. Abdollahpour S, Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The Effectiveness of Midwife-Led Interventions to Address Post-Partum Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Critical Appraisal of Clinical Trials. Journ al of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research 2020; 5:93-102 [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.5.3.93]
50. Irani M, Maleki N, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Assessing the Quality of randomized controlled trials published in relation to the Efficacy of Massage Therapy on Labor Pain Intensity Using CONSORT criteria. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2017; 6:56-63[Persian]
51. Ayatollahi M JP, Ghaem H. Assessment of quality randomized controlled trials published in Iran during 2000-2002. Babol University of Medical Journal 2004;7:64-70 [Persian]
52. DerSimonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B, Mosteller F. Reporting on methods in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 1982;306:1332-7 [DOI:10.1056/NEJM198206033062204]
53. Altman DG, Dore C. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. The Lancet 1990;335:149-53 [DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90014-V]
54. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 1987;317:426-32 [DOI:10.1056/NEJM198708133170706]
55. Ghojazadeh M, Tavananezhad N, Karkhanee M, Naghavi Behzad M, Azami Aghdash S. Quality of randomized clinical trial reports published by Iranian researchers in the obstetrics and gynecology level 1 journals: Using consort. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2013; 16:7-15[Persian]
56. Salehian M, Karimi FZ. Critical Appraisal of the Published Randomized Controlled Trials That Examined the Effect of Counseling-Educational Interventions On Exclusive Breastfeeding. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health 2022; 10:3186-97
57. Mehrazmay A, Karambakhsh A, Salesi M. Reporting quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in nephrology urology monthly journal. Nephro-Urology Monthly 2015; 7:23-31 [DOI:10.5812/numonthly.28752]
58. Wang P, Xu Q, Sun Q, Fan F-f, Guo X-r, Guo F. Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with traditional Chinese medicine: a systematic review. PLoS One 2013; 8:70-76 [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070586]
59. Joukar F, Heidarzadeh A, Asgharnezhad M, Soltanipour S, Jalali M, Moradi M. Evaluation of clinical trial abstracts of scientific journal using the CONSORT checklist. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences 2015; 24:40-51[Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |