Volume 21, Issue 6 (November-December 2022)
Payesh 2022, 21(6): 637-640 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sheikhy-Chaman M, Sanad-Gol S, Hamouzadeh P, Souresrafil A. Process of providing scientific evidence: The role of peer review and the motivation of reviewers. Payesh 2022; 21 (6) :637-640
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-1969-en.html
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-1969-en.html
1- School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Vice President for Student and Cultural Affairs Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Vice President for Student and Cultural Affairs Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1947 Views)
Dear editor, Scientific evidence is provided using different resources and during a regulated cycle. Various variables could influence the cycle. Of these the role of peer reviewer is very important. They could be influential in the growth and development of biomedical journals and pave the way for investigators and authors of scientific papers. It is recommended that specialized training be held to improve the review skills. A detailed understanding of the motivation of reviewers also is recommended.
Subject:
Letter to editor
Received: 2022/10/12 | Accepted: 2022/11/21 | ePublished ahead of print: 2022/11/21 | Published: 2023/01/2
Received: 2022/10/12 | Accepted: 2022/11/21 | ePublished ahead of print: 2022/11/21 | Published: 2023/01/2
References
1. Sheikhy-Chaman M. The Cycle of Policy Making, Management and Economics of Health System. Management Strategies in Health System 2020;5:169-72 [In Persian] [DOI:10.18502/mshsj.v5i3.4901]
2. Miri M M, Hosseini Zijoud S R. How to be a Professional Peer Reviewer of Manuscripts for Medical Journals - Narative Review. Journal Military Medcine 2017;18:290-8 [In Persian]
3. Panahi S, Fakharpour S, Sedghi S. The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences' Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles. Payavard 2022;15:519-28 [In Persian]
4. Sheikhy-Chaman M. Letter to Editor: Research Culture and Research Misconduct. Journal Education& Ethics in Nursing 2021;10(1 and 2):1-3 [In Persian]
5. Ebrahimpour Mouziraji Z, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L. A Different Look at Peer-Reviewing of Articles. International Journal of Medical Education 2022;22:154-5 [In Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |