Fri, Jun 5, 2020
Volume 18, Issue 2 (March-April 2019)                   Payesh 2019, 18(2): 173-182 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbaszadeh M, Aghayari Hir T, Alizadeh Aghdam M B, Adlipour S. Attitude towards childbearing among married women and men aged 18-49 years: The role of religiosity, family, modern media, and modern rethinking. Payesh. 2019; 18 (2) :173-182
1- Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (799 Views)
Objective (s): As sociologists believe, some part of family changes in Iran is due to changes in people's attitudes toward childbearing values. The present study aimed to study some social factors affecting the attitude towards childbearing among married women and men.
Methods: This cross-sectional was conducted among a sample of married women and men aged 18 to 49 years using cluster sampling technique in Tabriz, Iran. The research instrument consisted of a self-designed questionnaire on attitude towards childbearing, religiosity, family and modern media and modern rethinking.
Results: In all 415 citizens were selected. There was no significant difference in attitudes toward childbearing between women and men (p‌= 0.919), but there was significant difference between participants with different educational levels (p‌= 0.010) and socioeconomic statuses (p‌= 0.027) regarding attitudes toward childbearing. There was a direct correlation between family orientation (p=0.000, r=0.54) and religiosity (p < 0.0001, r=0.42) with the attitudes toward childbearing, and between modern reflexivity (p < 0.0001, r= -0.38), degree of usage of internet (p < 0.0001, r= -0.30) and degree of usage of virtual social networks (p= <0.0001, r= -0.24) with the attitudes toward childbearing.  Independent variables entering the regression model explained 40% of the variance in attitudes toward the participants’ childbearing.
Conclusion: To create positive attitudes towards childbearing among Iranian families, special attentions should be paid to strengthen family life and religion believes.
Full-Text [PDF 563 kb]   (279 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Medical
Accepted: 2019/05/29 | ePublished ahead of print: 2019/06/2 | Published: 2019/06/9

1. Hosseini GH, Hosseini H. Comparingdeterminants of fertility behaviour among Kurdish women living in rural areas of Ravansar and Gilangharb cities.Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 2013;17:316-24 [Persian]
2. Zare Z, Saffari E, Kiaee Tabar R. Fertility motivations and their relation with attitude towards government incentives for childbearing in women of reproductive age. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2018;28:104-14 [Persian]
3. Erfani A. Fertility in Tehran city and Iran: rates, trends and differentials. Population Studies 2013;1:87-153 [Persian]
4. Safiri K, Kamali A, Faraji E. Sociological study of positive attitude toward the child (Case study of women of Ilam city). WomensStrategyStudies 2017;19:85-109 [Persian]
5. RastegarKhaled A, Mohammadi M. Cultural changes and fertility decline in Iran (based on secondary analysis of the data of the survey of Iranian values and attitudes). Journal ofApplied Sociology 2015;26:159-80 [Persian]
6. Parvinian F, Rostamalizadeh V, Habibi R. The effects of women's modern lifestyle on their fertility and childbearing- a case study in Qazvin city. Journal ofWoman&Society 2019;9:39-72 [Persian]
7. Afshari Z. The Socio-Economic Determinants of Fertility in Iran (Panel Data Approach). Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research 2016;6:13-20 [Persian]
8. Ojaghlou S, Moradi A, Ghasemi I, Arshad J. Generational changes in the value of children and the childbearing behavior of women before and after the Islamic Revolution (Case Study: Zanjan City). Woman in Culture & Art 2012;6:409-25 [Persian]
9. Chamani S, Shakribii A, Moshfegh M. Sociological determinants of childbearing (case study: married women in Tehran). Journal of Sociocultural Strategy 2016;5:137-65 [Persian]
10. Razaghi Nasrabad H. How women's education affects delinquency in childbearing?: the results of a qualitative study among university students of Tehran.Journal of Sociocultural Strategy 2016;5:167-90 [Persian]
11. Eshaghi M, Mohebbi SF, Papinejad S, Jahandar Z. Working women's childbearing challenges: a qualitative study. Women in Development and Politics 2014;12:111-34 [Persian]
12. Chamani S, Moshfeq M, Shekarbeigi A. The study of challenges pertaining to the child bearing in tehran city with the emphasis on the mixed method. Gender and FamilyStudies 2015;3:9-38 [Persian]
13. Jokar M. Modernity, lifestyle change and population decrease in Iran. Islamic Research Journal of Women and Family 2014;2:39-69 [Persian]
14. Tavousi M, Esmaeil Motlagh M, Eslami M, Haerimehrizi A, Hashemi A, Montazeri A. Fertility desire and its correlates: a pilot study among married citizens living in Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2015;5:597-605 [Persian]
15. KavehFiruz Z, Karami F. Assessment of the impact of family power structure on fertility rate in Tehran City. Women in Development and Politics. 2015;13:291-308 [Persian]
16. Sadeghi R. Analysis of socio-cultural context of women's fertility decline in Iran. Journal of Sociocultural Strategy 2016;5:217-46 [Persian]
17. Mobasheri M, Alidosti M, Sorshajani S, Khosravi F, Khalafian P, Jalilian M. Determination of the most important factors influencing the fertility patterns of single child and without child families in Shahr-e-kord city in 2013. Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2013;21:63-70 [Persian]
18. Barber JS. Ideeational influences on the transition to Parenthood: Attitudes toward Childbearing and Competing Alternatives. Social Psychology Quartly 2001;64:101-27 [DOI:10.2307/3090128]
19. Mitchell D, Gray E. Declining Fertility: Intentions, attitudes and aspirations. Journal of Sociology 2007;43:23-44 [DOI:10.1177/1440783307073933]
20. Hosseini H, Bagi B. Determinant of economic social, cultural and demographic of childbearing tendencies in married of referred to health centers in Hamadan city. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 2012;18:35-43 [Persian]
21. Baezzat F, Ahmadi Ghozlojeh A, Marzbani Y, Karimi A, Azarnioshan B. A study of psychometric properties of Persian version of attitudes toward fertility and childbearing scale. Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty 2017;15:37-47 [Persian]
22. Mousavi SF, Ghafelebashi MS. A study of attitudes towards childbearing in young families of Qazvin city. Women and Family Studies 2014;1:111-34 [Persian]
23. Piltan F, Rahmanian M. Sociological study of factors affecting the tolerance of children of married women and men (case study: women and men aged 25-45 years in Jahrom). Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies 2015;7:121-34 [Persian]
24. Rastegar Khaled A, Moghadami S. Examination of gender differences in attitude towards children. Woman in Culture & Art 2016;8:101-16 [Persian]
25. Hashemi F, Rajabi M, Ahmadi A. Study of women's attitude toward value of children (case study: women 15-49 years old of Shiraz City). Journal of Applied Sociology 2017;28:61-78 [Persian]
26. Arjmand Sahpoush I, Boroumand N. Investigation of social and cultural factors affecting the propensity to childbearing in Andimeshk City with emphasis on lifestyle (case study of married women under 35).Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth 2016;6:9-24 [Persian]
27. Pezhhan A, Arab SM. The social, cultural and economic factors affecting the number of ideal children among employed and unemployed women in district 8 of Tehran city. Journal ofPopulation 2017;22:58-78 [Persian]
28. Moshfegh M, Ghreb Eshgee S. An analysis on relationship between the value of children and fertility among tehran's women.Womens Strategy Studies 2013;15:93-120 [Persian]
29. Hosseini H. Socioeconomic Demography and Family Planning. 2st Edition, Hamadan University, Iran, 2011 [Persian]
30. Atoh M. The relevance of ideational changes to family transformation in postwar Japan. In international family change. 1 st Editon, Routledge: UK, 2008
31. Mahmoudian H, Rezaei M. Women and low childbearing action:the case study of kurdish women.Womens Strategy Studies 2012;14:173-225 [Persian]
32. Sadeghi FasaeiS, Isari M.The sociological study of divorce patterns. Journal of Social Problems of Iran 2015;6:131-56 [Persian]
33. Khormour Y, Dehghan AA, Dehghan F, Behjati ASL SF. The relationship between globalization and rethinking among the youth in Yazd City. Journal of Social Development 2017;12:127-50 [Persian]
34. Rasoulzadeh Aghdam S, Afshar S, Adlipour S, Mir Mohammadtabar SA. Analysis of the relationship between social capital and lifestyle with tendency to childbearing (Case study: Students of Azerbaijan Shahid Madani University).Journal of Sociocultural Strategy 2017;5:107-35 [Persian]
35. Enayat H, Parnian L. Study of the relationship between cultural globalization and the propensity for childbearing. Journal of Woman & Society 2013;4:109-136 [Persian]
36. Kola O, Uchec IA, Akinrinola B. Correlates ofspousal communication on fertility and family planning among theYoruba of Nigeria. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 2006;37:441-460 [DOI:10.3138/jcfs.37.3.441]
37. Ghorbani F, Golmakani N, Shakeri MT. Relationship between the use of virtual social networks and tendency to childbearing in the students of Ferdowsi and Mashhad university of medical sciences. Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2016;19:15-24 [Persian]
38. Kalantari S, Abbaszadeh M, Mozaffari F, Rakaei Bonab N. Sociological study of tendency to childbearing and some related factors (Case study: married youth of Tabriz city). Journal of Applied Sociology 2010;3:83-104 [Persian]
39. Pezhhan A, Kamaliha A. The Effect of Cultural Factors on Women's Reproduction in 15-50 Years of the 12th District of Tehran. Journal of Sociocultural Studies 2015;6:115-37 [Persian]
40. Rad F, Savabi H. Investigating the tendency towards childbearing and its related factors (case study of married women 15-15 years living in Tabriz City). Journal of Woman and Family Studies 2015;3:127-155 [Persian]
41. RastegarKhaled A, Moghadami S. Investigatingng the relationship between tendency toward secular values and attitude toward child among couples aged 15-49 years in Tehran. Journal ofSociology ofSocialInstitutions 2018;5:159-80 [Persian]
42. Kertzer D, White M, Bernardi L, Gabrielli G. Italy's path to very low fertility:the adequacy of economic and second demographic transition theories.European Journal of Population 2009;25:89-115 [DOI:10.1007/s10680-008-9159-5]
43. Foroutan Y, Rezaei Pashaei S. The effect of religious identity on desertification in selected rural and urban areas of Iran. Natlional Studies2018;19:75-96 [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Payesh (Health Monitor)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb