Volume 2, Issue 2 (APRIL 2003)
Payesh 2003, 2(2): 131-136 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fasihi Harandy T, Soltani Arabshahi K. A survey of input and process of clinical education in Iran University of Medical Sciences. Payesh 2003; 2 (2) :131-136
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-845-en.html
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-845-en.html
Abstract: (6491 Views)
Objective(s): To determine the quality and quantity of input and process of clinical education in Iran
University of Medical Sciences.
Material & Methods: Through a descriptive analytic study, 3 questionnaires were used to gather data. Results: The result indicated that the proportion of clinical students to teachers, in each teaching round was (9.23) and the proportion of students to teaching bed, patient. medical personnel, books in selected hospitals was (2.5), (1.9), (1.3), (25.5) respectively. The highest total mean score in scientific mastery and educational administration domain was related to internal medicine ( x =3.32, X=2.95) respectively and in communication and consultation was related to obstetrics and gynecologic group ( x =3.04).
Conclusion: Promoting quality of clinical education is related to changing attitudes and introducing new
educational methods, evaluation and also active and effective presence of teachers in clinical fields.
University of Medical Sciences.
Material & Methods: Through a descriptive analytic study, 3 questionnaires were used to gather data. Results: The result indicated that the proportion of clinical students to teachers, in each teaching round was (9.23) and the proportion of students to teaching bed, patient. medical personnel, books in selected hospitals was (2.5), (1.9), (1.3), (25.5) respectively. The highest total mean score in scientific mastery and educational administration domain was related to internal medicine ( x =3.32, X=2.95) respectively and in communication and consultation was related to obstetrics and gynecologic group ( x =3.04).
Conclusion: Promoting quality of clinical education is related to changing attitudes and introducing new
educational methods, evaluation and also active and effective presence of teachers in clinical fields.
type of study: Descriptive |
Accepted: 2018/11/28 | Published: 2003/04/15
Accepted: 2018/11/28 | Published: 2003/04/15
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |