Lifetime Childlessness and Its Socioeconomic Correlates among the Married Women Living in Provinces with Very Low Fertility Rates in Iran - Payesh (Health Monitor)
Sat, Apr 20, 2024
OPEN ACCESS
Volume 19, Issue 5 (September - October 2020)                   Payesh 2020, 19(5): 541-548 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahmoudiani S. Lifetime Childlessness and Its Socioeconomic Correlates among the Married Women Living in Provinces with Very Low Fertility Rates in Iran. Payesh 2020; 19 (5) :541-548
URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-1457-en.html
Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (2805 Views)
Objective (s): Childlessness in low fertility rate situation can be considered as a demographic problem. This study was attempted to investigate the permanent or lifetime childlessness among married women aged 40-49 living in Gilan, Mazandaran and Tehran provinces as provinces with very low fertility rates.
Methods: The data were derived from the 2016 census micro-data. Data analysis was performed in SPSS 20 using frequency tables, Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.
Results: The results showed that 4.4% of the women were permanent childless. Logistic regression analysis indicated that educational level as an individual characteristic as well as the type of home ownership and living area as the residential and household characteristics had a statistically significant effect on the odds of being childless.
Conclusion: The prevalence of lifetime childlessness was relatively low in population studied. Planning to improve the housing situation of households, especially among young households, might prevent the increase of the proportion of childlessness in the future.    
Full-Text [PDF 627 kb]   (5349 Downloads)    
type of study: Descriptive |
Received: 2020/07/3 | Accepted: 2020/07/18 | ePublished ahead of print: 2020/09/14 | Published: 2020/10/24

References
1. Kneale D, Joshi H. Postponement and childlessness: evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research 2008; 19: 1935-1968 [DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.58]
2. Baudin T, Croix D, Gobbi PE. Fertility and childlessness in United States. American Economic Review 2015; 105:1852-1882 [DOI:10.1257/aer.20120926]
3. Kelly M. Women's voluntary childlessness: a radical rejection of motherhood. Women's Studies Quarterly 2009; 37:157-172 [DOI:10.1353/wsq.0.0164]
4. Haerimehrizi, A, Tavousi M, Sadighi J, Motlagh MS, Eslami M, Nghizadeh F, Montazri A. Reasons for fertility desire disinterest among Iranian married adults: A population-based study. Payesh 2017; 5: 637-645 [Persian]
5. Razavizadeh N, Ghafarian A, Akhlaqi A. The contexts of low and late fertility in Mashhad. Strategy for Culture 2015; 31: 73-98 [Persian]
6. Kanani MA, Bakhshi S. Spread of individualization and the problem of childbearing reduction: a study in the city of Rasht. Journal of Population Association of Iran 2015; 9: 1-25 [Persian]
7. Abbasi-Shavzi MJ, Khani S. Economic Insecurity and Fertility: Case Study of Married Women in Sanandaj District. Journal of Population Association of Iran 2014; 9: 37-76 [Persian]
8. Lundquist JH, Budig MJ, Curtis A, Teachman J. Race and childlessness in America 1988-2002. Journal of Marriage and Family 2009; 71: 741-755 [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00630.x]
9. Boddington B, Didham R. Increase in childlessness in New Zealand. Population Research 2009; 26: 131-151 [DOI:10.1007/s12546-009-9008-3]
10. Grindstaff CF, Balakrishnan TR, Ebanks GE. Socio-demographic of correlates of childlessness: an analysis of the 1971 Canadian census. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 1981; 6: 337-351 [DOI:10.2307/3340238]
11. Hayford SR. Marriage (still) matters: the contribution of demographic change to trends in childlessness in the United States. Demography 2013; 50: 1641-1661 [DOI:10.1007/s13524-013-0215-3]
12. Merz EM, Liefbroer AC. The attitude towards voluntary childlessness in Europe: cultural and institutional explanations. Marriage and Family 2012; 74: 587-600 [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x]
13. Miranti R, McNamara J, Tanton R, Yap M. A narrowing gap? Trends in the childlessness of professional women in Australia 1986-2006. Population Research 2009; 26: 359-379 [DOI:10.1007/s12546-009-9022-5]
14. Biryukova SS, Tyndik AO. Prevalence and determinants of childlessness in Russia and Moscow. Genus 2015; 71: 1-22
15. Hamidifar M, Kanani MA, Abdollahi-Chanzanaq H. Voluntary childless' sight on childbearing: A study in Rasht. Cultural Sociology 2017; 8: 27-54 [Persian]
16. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ. Population trends and situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2st Edition, National Population Studies & Comprehensive Management Institute: Tehran, 2017 [Persian]
17. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. Fertility evolution in Iran during recent four decades. 1st Edition, The Statistical Centre of Iran: Tehran, 2012 [Persian]
18. The Statistical Centre of Iran. Total fertility rate during 2012-2016. The Statistical Centre of Iran: Tehran, 2016. https://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/0/News/1396/1_barvari.pdf
19. McDonald P. Very low fertility: consequences, causes and policy approaches. The Japanese Journal of Population 2008; 6: 19-23
20. Goli Y, Mahmoudiani S, Delangizan S. The Impact of Household Socio-Economic Characteristics on Women's Fertility in Iran. Journal of Population Association of Iran 2016; 10: 188-211 [Persian]
21. The Statistical Centre of Iran. The census micro-data of population and housing in 2016. The Statistical Centre of Iran: Tehran, 2016. https://www.amar.org.ir/

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Payesh (Health Monitor)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb