Translation and psychometric properties of the sexually transmitted infection prevention scales in females - Payesh (Health Monitor)
Volume 18, Issue 2 (March-April 2019)                   Payesh 2019, 18(2): 183-189 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.MODARES.REC.1397.154

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran
2- Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3894 Views)
Objective (s): Considering the importance of preventive behaviors of sexually transmitted infections in women as a vulnerable group, for the first time this study aimed to translate and evaluate the validity and reliability of four sexually transmitted infection prevention scales in females.
Methods: A standard forward-backward translation method used to develop the Persian version of four sexually transmitted infection prevention scales. Content validity of the scales (knowledge, perceived vulnerability, self-efficacy, and Intention) was assessed through a panel expert. Face validity of scales was established via impact score and a sample of lay people. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by the test-retest method (intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency (calculating the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient).
Results: The CVR and CVI for the four-scales ranged from 0.56 to 1.00 and from 0.83 to 1.00 respectively. The impact score of all items was more than 1.5. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66 – 0.85 and (0.84- 0.97 respectively.
Conclusion: The results showed that the Persian version of four sexually transmitted infection prevention scales has proper validity and reliability. It can be used as a useful tool to evaluate knowledge, perceived vulnerability, self-efficacy, and intent to prevent infections about STI in females.
Full-Text [PDF 602 kb]   (1011 Downloads)    
type of study: Descriptive |
Accepted: 2019/05/29 | ePublished ahead of print: 2019/06/9 | Published: 2019/06/9

References
1. World Health Organization. Sexually transmitted infections(STIs)Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 [Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/index.html.
2. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections 2016-2021: toward ending STIs 2016 [Available from : https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246296/WHO-RHR-16.09-eng.pdf. Access in June 2016
3. Toskin I. Epidemiology of STIs: factors, numbers and surveillance. Paper presented at: Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research; Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015[Available from: https://www.gfmer.ch/SRH-Course-2015/sti/Epidemiology-STIs-Toskin-2015.htm Access in Jul 2015
4. Mabey D. Epidemiology of STIs: worldwide. Medicine 2005;33:4-7 [DOI:10.1383/medc.2005.33.9.4]
5. World Health Organization. The importance of a renewed commitment to STI prevention and control in achieving global sexual and reproductive health. Geneva: World Health Organization 2013 [Available from http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75838 Access in June 2012
6. Braxton J, Carey D, Davis DW, Footman A, Flagg EW, Grier L, et al. Reported STDs in the United States: 2012 national data for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis 2014[Available from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/21549 Access in January 2014
7. Boroumandfar Z, Kianpour M, Zargham A, Abdoli S, Tayeri K, Salehi M, et al. Changing beliefs and behaviors related to sexually transmitted diseases in vulnerable women: A qualitative study. Iranian journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 2017;22:303 [DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_117_16]
8. Roshani D, Ramazanzadeh R, Farhadifar F, Ahmadi A, Derakhshan S, Rouhi S, et al. A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis on Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Iranian women (1986-2015). Medicine 2018;97:16 [DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010335]
9. Ghaffari M, Jamali R, Rakhshanderou S, Eslami AA. Effect of educational program on HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, attitude, and behavioral intentions of male high school's students in Bavanat (Fars province): An interventional research. Journal of Health in the Field 2013;1: 6-12
10. Mousavi M, Fararouei M, Kazerooni PA, Nasirian M, Ghaem H. Population based estimation of point and period prevalence of sexully transmitted infections based the iranian symptoms surveillance system. Amazonia Investiga. 2019 14;8:29-42
11. Coyle K, Basen-Engquist K, Kirby D, Parcel G, Banspach S, Collins J, Baumler E, Carvajal S, Harrist R. Safer choices: reducing teen pregnancy, HIV, and STDs. Public health reports. 2016 Nov 30
12. Farazmand K, Keshavarz N, Etemad K, Farazmand P. Assessment of female students' knowledge and attitude towards sexually transmitted infections in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 2015. Journal of Health in the Field 2017;4:27-35
13. Rahmatinajar klaie f. Tehran University students knowledge about sexually transmitted disease. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery 2007;17:9-14
14. Khani Jeihooni A, Ghaedi R, Kashfi SM, Khiyali Z. Effect of Education Based on the Health Belief Model in the Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Couples Participating in Premarriage Training Classes. J Educ Community Health 2018;4:4-12 [DOI:10.21859/jech.4.4.4]
15. Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health education research 1986;1:153-61 [DOI:10.1093/her/1.3.153]
16. Jeong S, Cha C, Lee J. The effects of STI education on Korean adolescents using smartphone applications. Health Education Journal 2017;76:775-86 [DOI:10.1177/0017896917714288]
17. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel psychology1975;28:563-75 [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
18. Santos JRA. Cronbach's alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of extension1999;37:1-5

Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.